My suggestion for a good application to be used in class is DRAWP. It is easy to use and, therefore, easy to teach students how to use it. Some of the uses that can be applied to classes are for making posters, flashcards, or even illustrations for their own stories. Here is a tutorial video that will show you the ropes. I am sure it will be fun!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=y2pC0mCvvAE
Enjoy
Sunday, June 29, 2014
Saturday, June 14, 2014
Simple Prep iPad Activity - Creating Movie Trailers
Slide shows are definitely are good way to tell a story
using pictures or videos. The web is populated by a vast amount of slide show
services. As an educator, I am a subscriber to many of those services and have
frequently used them whenever I want to display pictures in an animated
fashion followed by music. However, many of the services available on the net require an internet connection and that might make it a bit challenging for creating such artifacts in class if you do not have a connection or the one you have is too slow.
One
of the solutions to this problem is to use iMovie to create movie trailers. Such trailers look like slide shows and are quite easy to create. All you need to do is to open the iMovie app, click on the + sign and choose the trailer option. As I said previously, you can do it without internet connection, save and later export to YouTube, iTunes, Facebook, etc. It is very intuitive and your students can do it themselves. Another thing our teenage students can also do is to create movie trailers for the graded readers they read in class every semester.
Here is a short tutorial
Here is a movie trailer I created with our English Access students. Before creating it, I showed to them the theme we would work on. I divided the picture frames in terms of their experience as students so far asking what they had done, what they liked best. They wrote down their ideas and I gave them my iPad and my iPhone and told them to take shots. This is the final result.
Friday, May 30, 2014
Simple Prep iPad Activity: Creating Stories in Class
Stories help us organize and remember information and tie content
together. I've already talked about the power of online storytelling and the
myriad online resources available to experience such fantastic educational tool
(click here to check this post).
With the advance of technology and the integration of iPads in the
classroom, teachers are now able explore the power of storytelling in different
ways. Some apps have been developed where students can imagine, create, and
share what they make. Thus, students will be the ones creating content, putting
their ideas together to tell a story using creative and engaging platforms.
Two of my favorite apps for creating stories are Scribble my Story and Creative
Pad. These apps can be incorporated into your lesson plan with very simple
previous preparation.
With Scribble my Story students can create their own story by picking a blank book, adding their own
voice and illustrating in different ways. There’s also the option of changing the
background color, adding stickers and stamps. As a follow-up activity, students
can read their stories to each other, or teachers can project students' stories and ask comprehension questions about them.
Creative Pad presents a more
comprehensive platform. There are several different themes students can choose
from, with different settings for every theme available. Students can add characters, all sort of
objects, animals, musical instruments, nature elements, etc. In order to create
the story, students can add dialog boxes and also write captions in each of the
slides. In the end, the story can be sent via email in a pdf version. I guess
parents would love to receive their kids’ production. What do you think?
How would you include storytelling production in your class?
How would you include storytelling production in your class?
Monday, May 26, 2014
TESOL 2014 – Mousetraps for Language Teaching
Being a so called TESOLer is having an
opportunity to be part of a dynamic community of professionals. Therefore, it is always a rewarding
experience to attend (and present at!) a TESOL Conference, and this year
couldn’t have been different. I knew in advance that I would have a chance to
attend presentations with Diane Larsen-Freeman, Douglas Brown and Penny Ur,
among others. In fact, there were so many different presentations with
interesting titles and renowned presenters that it was hard to choose what to
attend.
However, having read, studied and
used as reference Dr Douglas Brown’s books for so many years, it would be
inevitable not to share his presentation here. His My “top ten” list of mousetraps presentation
revolves around the “mousetraps” which
work very well in our profession.
He started his presentation by
asking the audience to think about the mousetraps
– “principles, methods and the kind of foundation stones” - we have been engaged
in during our professional lives. Dr Brown made us stop to think about the kind
of methodology we rely on in our teaching when we plan our classes. After a
brief review of his “Ten Commandments” (from 1990), the presenter stated that,
at the time, he simply pictured everything relatively unified in some kind of
Strategic Investment Mousetrap,
meaning that we teachers would get our students to invest in the language we
were teaching.
Then he wondered whether or not we were right to do so at the time, however, what really mattered was that we were on the right track. From then on, Dr. Brown stated that many things have changed, for there have been lots of research for the past twenty-four years, and that there are now better mousetraps, showing the audience how our profession has progressed in many positive ways. However, before starting to talk about those “top ten” mousetraps, he made a point of telling us that things have evolved, becoming simpler, but not that the twelve principles from his well-known book Teaching by Principles (1993, 2000, 2007) don’t work anymore, for they are still great principles; it’s just that researchers have improved on them.
That being said, the presenter made it clear that those changes encompass all the connections that researchers in the field have been making with learners, for they revolve around what makes students successful and what makes them interested in learning, not forgetting about all the global implications of teaching English worldwide. Based on that, he compared the traditional mousetraps to the better mousetraps for language learning.
Then he wondered whether or not we were right to do so at the time, however, what really mattered was that we were on the right track. From then on, Dr. Brown stated that many things have changed, for there have been lots of research for the past twenty-four years, and that there are now better mousetraps, showing the audience how our profession has progressed in many positive ways. However, before starting to talk about those “top ten” mousetraps, he made a point of telling us that things have evolved, becoming simpler, but not that the twelve principles from his well-known book Teaching by Principles (1993, 2000, 2007) don’t work anymore, for they are still great principles; it’s just that researchers have improved on them.
That being said, the presenter made it clear that those changes encompass all the connections that researchers in the field have been making with learners, for they revolve around what makes students successful and what makes them interested in learning, not forgetting about all the global implications of teaching English worldwide. Based on that, he compared the traditional mousetraps to the better mousetraps for language learning.
Traditional Mousetraps
|
Better Mousetraps
|
# 10 Behavioral
vs. Cognitive
Competence vs. Performance
Innate (acquired) vs. Learners
|
Dynamic Systems Theory
Emergentism (This term is used to say that language
learning is like any other learning, for it emerges from the human being like
other skills emerge.)
|
# 9 Transfer
Interference
Overgeneralization
|
Embodied Cognition
(According to Brown, cognition is part of a
whole picture: body, mind and world connections. He states that it’s like
“opening up and capturing the concept of transfer, interference and overgeneralization
in a much more holistic and refreshing way for teachers”.)
|
# 8 Focal
vs. Peripheral Attention
Controlled vs. Automatic Processing
|
Form-focused
Instruction (FFI): Noticing
(The idea here is to get sts to work with the
pieces of language they learn and put them together with a whole form with
all the communicative efforts. Students need to notice the language in order
to be successful at using it.)
|
# 7 Strategy-based Instruction (SBI)
Awareness
-> Action
Autonomy
|
Self-regulation, Scaffolding
Mediation, ZPD
(This mousetrap
is about having teachers mediate the learning process that learners are
going through in the classroom and how they can work within sts’ zone of development
to keep them progressing along with awareness and action.)
|
# 6 Intrinsic Motivation
Meaningful (vs. Rote) Learning
Autonomy
|
Investment
Imagined Community
(This principle is important to remind
teachers that the perception learners have is more important than the reality
they face. As teachers, we need to help learners square their imagination to
their own reality; to the community they will be using the language with.)
|
# 5 Personality & Cognitive Styles
Anxiety, Risk-taking, Empathy
Self-esteem
|
Communities of Practice
Self-efficacy
(According to this principle, nowadays, teachers
shouldn’t look at learners as individuals who are striving to overcome their anxiety
and self-esteem, but as communities of learners. We should see our classrooms
as communities of practice and the future of the language in those
communities of practice.)
|
# 4 Community Competence
Willingness to Communicate (WTC)
|
Interaction, Collaboration
Communities of Practice
(Once again, Dr
Brown states that researchers’ theories and methodologies are showing that
learners shouldn’t be seen as individuals working alone in the world, but
people relating to other people, within communities. It’s all about the
social nature of language.)
|
# 3
Intercultural Competence
Cross-cultural Analysis
Social Distance, Optimal Distance
|
Languageculture
(With the global use
of English, in this mousetrap, the
presenter says that the concept of crossing-cultures is changing and that the
term Languaculture is being used, for it captures the notion that language
and culture are intertwined.)
|
# 2 Language Ego
Inhibition
|
Identity
(This is an extremely important principle,
for the whole notion of identity is related to the way people talk, and that
is something we can’t change. There are few things you can do to improve the
way people talk, because the way they talk is the way they are.)
|
# 1 Empowerment
Self-actualization
|
Agency
(This is the concept which Dr Brown believes
wraps it all up, for it reminds us that, in his own words, “our mission with
our students is to help them to be agents, using the language, internalizing
the language, making choices of their own, and not think of themselves as
second class citizens”.)
|
Before his closing remarks, Dr Brown
mentioned he hopes that, in a couple of years, there will be no distinction
between non-native English speakers and native English speakers, for this
distinction is something from the past. He also added that non-native English
speaker teachers who have learned English as their second (or third) language are
the most wonderful teachers that one can have, for we are agents; we have identified
ourselves in the English language.
The presenter ended his presentation
with a quote from Gandhi which says that we “must be the change we want to
see”. Douglas Brown thinks that we are becoming even more humane in the process
of being English teachers. He is also encouraged by what has been happening in
the last four decades and the directions that our profession is turning to and
the methodology that has been embracing the different identities of our
learners. For all of us there, he left the challenge of taking those principles
and making them work in our classrooms.
As for me, I left his presentation
not only feeling blessed for having the opportunity to attend it, but also with
the feeling that one of my favorite authors, who has inspired me as a
professional for more than twenty years, has shown that I have also been on the
right track by researching and trying to adapt the mousetraps to my own teaching.
*H. Douglas Brown & Heekyeong Lee are launching the fourth edition of Teaching by Principles, in early 2015.
*H. Douglas Brown & Heekyeong Lee are launching the fourth edition of Teaching by Principles, in early 2015.
Simple Prep iPad Activity - Power up Motivation in the EFL Classroom
Have you ever been surprised by how creative our students can be? This post is about a task I asked my Teen 3 students to do that required no prep and surprised me a lot because they came out with outcomes that were way more creative than what I had imagined.
I was teaching vocabulary to describe feelings, and I gave groups slips with some vocabulary related to the lesson. I asked students to take pictures to illustrate the words with the iPads. .
Students then had to make a short video using Educreations asking the group to guess what feelings their photos related to. We had a lot of fun, and they wanted to play the game over and over, which I did not mind at all because they got lots of personalized input.
Labels:
apptivity,
classroomactivities,
classroomactivity,
educreations,
ideas,
iPad,
ipads,
mlearning,
noprep,
simpleprep,
teens3
Friday, May 23, 2014
Simple Prep iPad Activity: TELLAGAMI - Giving Life to Students´ Avatar and their Language Production
Tellagami is one of those multi-purpose free apps that will give an extra boost to your classroom activity, with lots of student production in English.
Here´s an overview of the app:
In the classroom, use Tellagami to:
- let the avatar tell a story about a specific place (you can change the background there)
- review a concept. Students have to summarize what they´ve just learned
- do a follow-up activity in which students tell their own views on the topic
- drill basic structures in a young learners´ class ( I like; I don´t like; I have; I don´t have)
- practice physical descriptions when students are creating their avatar; then, they record about their best friend´s physical appearance
- work on clothing by changing the avatar´s outfits; the avatar can record why he chose that specific outfit
Students can record their own voices, or even use the text to speech feature (they write the text and choose the accent of their avatar. Warning: this feature only works when there´s Internet connection).
GOING THE EXTRA MILE: there´s an editing feature on YOUTUBE that you can put your students´ Tellagami videos altogether in one single Youtube video. Here´s an example from a training session we had about high performance class. First, we used this poster as a discussion springboard.
Then, the groups created their avatars and recorded their main ideas about highly performaning classes. Finally, I edited them, using Youtube editor, after having uploaded all the gamis.
Ready to begin? We´d love t know what you´ve been doing in class with Tellagami.
Labels:
app,
carlaarena,
classroom,
classroomactivity,
efl,
iPad,
ipad tips,
ipads,
language acquisition,
language learning,
mlearning,
simpleprep,
tefl,
tellagami,
tesol
Tuesday, May 20, 2014
Finding Motivation by Motivating Students
What do you do when your students fail their tests? Do you blame them or yourself? I used to blame myself, but I’ve learnt that the best alternative, at least for me, was to stop assigning blame and start thinking outside the box.
It’s natural to think that there are predetermined roles in the classroom and that simply by enrolling or being in the classroom, everyone will know what to do. That is exactly how I thought things were: I would go to a specific classroom in a specific time and so would students; I would teach and they would learn. It was only when I was confronted with terrible grades — only 3 out of 10 students had passing grades on their first written test — that I realized I was wasting a great opportunity.
My first reaction was to think I was a terrible teacher. After all, I am an absolute beginner, having only less than two years of experience. I spoke to several senior teachers and asked for advice. The first one I received was to check what exactly the students’ mistakes had been. Had they all made the same mistakes? If yes, I needed to check the way I had been teaching them. If not, I should check the students’ academic records to see if they had had difficulties in the previous levels. After some research, I realized two things: all students, even the ones who had good grades, made the same kinds of mistakes; and none of them had had a history of below average grades.
It’s important to note that students in the lower intermediate level get a really bad reputation. They are said to be the “weakest links”; students who didn’t do well on their replacement tests. I kept hearing that those bad grades were just what I should have expected. I felt extremely uncomfortable to just accept that these students were weak and that there was nothing I could do. In my mind, If I had been a better teacher, they would have done better. Besides, I had looked into their academic records and I could not find the proof that they were just bad students.
Another thing I was told by senior teachers was that there is a large gap between the Teens course and the Lower Intermediate course. In the latter, tests demand a lot more from students’ cognitive abilities. In fact, the one difficulty all students had was with listening and reading comprehension. It wasn’t something I had taught them; I had been too focused on teaching grammar and vocabulary.
My first step, after gathering advice I had received from several senior teachers, was to deliver the news to the students about their low performance and, at the same time, motivate them to do better on their next test. It seemed impossible! But the teachers I spoke to knew me and trusted me. They said I could do it. So I asked students how they had prepared for the test, how they thought they did, and if it had been easy or hard. I spoke to them in Portuguese and they opened up very quickly. I found out a lot from my students that day. They are under a lot of pressure from their parents, their regular schools and themselves. They also thought, same as I did, that teaching and learning were automatic processes, and all they had to do to get a good grade was to “sit down and study”. For them, given how they did on their test, it hadn’t been enough. I thought they were being too hard on themselves, but then again, I realized I had been too hard on myself too.
I needed to take the focus out of this blame game. I asked the students to trust me and to help me help them. Thinking about it now, I noticed that what I did was to ask them to stop looking for someone to blame and start focusing on learning. I remembered something that my coach had told me on my first semester at CTJ: “We a have to teach students how to learn”. So based on that and also on the things I have been learning at the TDC - Teacher Development Course, I started changing the way I planned the lessons for that specific group.
The first thing was to teach them strategies such as scanning and skimming. I showed them how to look for information, how to look for clues in exercises, patterns in sentences, and in essence, how to develop strategies to solve the exercises. I also turned the wrap up stages of the lessons into mini projects. For example, after a lesson about the differences between past simple and past continuous, I told the students to create a story using only three sentences. They all sat down on the classroom floor to make a poster together, and it was the first time I saw them actually happy to be in class.
Basically, I started focusing on making the students feel independent and in control of their own learning. I stopped simply giving them information and started giving them the tools to get there themselves. I noticed a complete change in behavior. What I had thought was just normal teenage behavior during a class at 2pm had basically been lack of motivation. Before, they were barely present in class, mostly quiet and unresponsive. They didn’t do their homework and they didn’t answer my questions. They also spoke a lot of Portuguese. Now, they try harder to speak English, they use the language being presented, they respond faster to eliciting. And, I’m relieved to say, out of all the students, only one had a below average grade on their second test. It was not a miracle change though, — the lowest passing grade was 76 — but I’m counting my blessings!
This had been the one group I dreaded meeting every week. They made me feel like a real failure. Now that they are motivated, they are the best part of my week. I’m glad I stopped focusing on laying blame and decided to trust the advice of senior teachers: I learned that motivating my students was the best way to motivate myself.
It’s natural to think that there are predetermined roles in the classroom and that simply by enrolling or being in the classroom, everyone will know what to do. That is exactly how I thought things were: I would go to a specific classroom in a specific time and so would students; I would teach and they would learn. It was only when I was confronted with terrible grades — only 3 out of 10 students had passing grades on their first written test — that I realized I was wasting a great opportunity.
My first reaction was to think I was a terrible teacher. After all, I am an absolute beginner, having only less than two years of experience. I spoke to several senior teachers and asked for advice. The first one I received was to check what exactly the students’ mistakes had been. Had they all made the same mistakes? If yes, I needed to check the way I had been teaching them. If not, I should check the students’ academic records to see if they had had difficulties in the previous levels. After some research, I realized two things: all students, even the ones who had good grades, made the same kinds of mistakes; and none of them had had a history of below average grades.
It’s important to note that students in the lower intermediate level get a really bad reputation. They are said to be the “weakest links”; students who didn’t do well on their replacement tests. I kept hearing that those bad grades were just what I should have expected. I felt extremely uncomfortable to just accept that these students were weak and that there was nothing I could do. In my mind, If I had been a better teacher, they would have done better. Besides, I had looked into their academic records and I could not find the proof that they were just bad students.
Another thing I was told by senior teachers was that there is a large gap between the Teens course and the Lower Intermediate course. In the latter, tests demand a lot more from students’ cognitive abilities. In fact, the one difficulty all students had was with listening and reading comprehension. It wasn’t something I had taught them; I had been too focused on teaching grammar and vocabulary.
My first step, after gathering advice I had received from several senior teachers, was to deliver the news to the students about their low performance and, at the same time, motivate them to do better on their next test. It seemed impossible! But the teachers I spoke to knew me and trusted me. They said I could do it. So I asked students how they had prepared for the test, how they thought they did, and if it had been easy or hard. I spoke to them in Portuguese and they opened up very quickly. I found out a lot from my students that day. They are under a lot of pressure from their parents, their regular schools and themselves. They also thought, same as I did, that teaching and learning were automatic processes, and all they had to do to get a good grade was to “sit down and study”. For them, given how they did on their test, it hadn’t been enough. I thought they were being too hard on themselves, but then again, I realized I had been too hard on myself too.
I needed to take the focus out of this blame game. I asked the students to trust me and to help me help them. Thinking about it now, I noticed that what I did was to ask them to stop looking for someone to blame and start focusing on learning. I remembered something that my coach had told me on my first semester at CTJ: “We a have to teach students how to learn”. So based on that and also on the things I have been learning at the TDC - Teacher Development Course, I started changing the way I planned the lessons for that specific group.
The first thing was to teach them strategies such as scanning and skimming. I showed them how to look for information, how to look for clues in exercises, patterns in sentences, and in essence, how to develop strategies to solve the exercises. I also turned the wrap up stages of the lessons into mini projects. For example, after a lesson about the differences between past simple and past continuous, I told the students to create a story using only three sentences. They all sat down on the classroom floor to make a poster together, and it was the first time I saw them actually happy to be in class.
Basically, I started focusing on making the students feel independent and in control of their own learning. I stopped simply giving them information and started giving them the tools to get there themselves. I noticed a complete change in behavior. What I had thought was just normal teenage behavior during a class at 2pm had basically been lack of motivation. Before, they were barely present in class, mostly quiet and unresponsive. They didn’t do their homework and they didn’t answer my questions. They also spoke a lot of Portuguese. Now, they try harder to speak English, they use the language being presented, they respond faster to eliciting. And, I’m relieved to say, out of all the students, only one had a below average grade on their second test. It was not a miracle change though, — the lowest passing grade was 76 — but I’m counting my blessings!
This had been the one group I dreaded meeting every week. They made me feel like a real failure. Now that they are motivated, they are the best part of my week. I’m glad I stopped focusing on laying blame and decided to trust the advice of senior teachers: I learned that motivating my students was the best way to motivate myself.
Thursday, May 15, 2014
BRAZTESOL Conference - Different Generations: A common Goal
We, Carolina Piacenti and Evania Netto have
just attended the Braz-Tesol Conference in João Pessoa, AL. It was a great
conference: well organized, in a great site (Escola Internacional Cidade Viva)
and in a beautiful city. Furthermore, the quality of the presentations were
fantastic and there wasn´t a single talk or workshop that we didn´t like or regretted
attending.
However, as the topic of our own presentation
was “generations” and the way that different generations of teachers can
benefit by working together, we started paying attention to the mix of
generations that could be seen and heard in the event. To start with, we
browsed through the program and realized we could choose from a workshop given
by one of the most renowned ELT senior representatives from Brasília-Sara
Walker, watch the plenary session given by the brilliant Jeremy Harmer or feel
touched by the emotional session about getting older given by Jane Revell. It
was not only the senior generation that made presence in the conference,
though. Looking again at the program, we could easily verify that the Baby Boomers
and the members of Generation X were also active, bringing innumerous
contributions to the field with names such as Ben Goldstein, Paul Seligson and
Jeff Stranks.
On the other hand, if one preferred to see the newer generation
of speakers, they would not be disappointed as they would be able to check CTJ
world-wide technology expert Carla Arena, an academic session about gaming and
gamification used in teaching and learning a second language given by Janaína
Weissheimer or the fantastic J.J. Wilson talk about teacher development. Nevertheless,
due to the amount and variety of choices, one would not be able to see everything
and would have to choose something related to their own field of interests
which would turn out not to make attendees less enthusiastic but to enhance their
social networking and ability to reflect upon their careers as they could see themselves
working in pairs with Scott Thurnbury, Steve Taylore-Knowles, Élcio Souza or
just a novice teacher who had just graduated from college.
So, as you can see, Braz-Tesol was a fruitful
and enriching professional experience where different identities met to form a
mosaic of generations that by collaborating could help each other achieve the
goal that the older, the middle or the younger generations of teachers have in common - to teach English in effective
ways.
Labels:
2014,
braztesol,
conference,
tefl,
tesol
Sunday, May 04, 2014
TESOL 2014 - On Language Development and Affordance
One of the highlights of
the 2014 TESOL International Conference was Diane Larsen Freeman’s plenary
entitled Complexity Theory: Renewing Our
Understanding of Language, Learning, and Teaching. Complexity Theory in Second Language
Acquisition is not an easy topic to digest, but Larsen-Freeman made it easy to
understand by way of her outstanding presentation skills and the illustrative
slides that helped visualize the actual simplicity of the theory and how much
sense it makes.
My first more in-depth
encounter with Larsen-Freeman’s discussion of Complexity Theory as an approach
to second language acquisition, or rather, development, was through her chapter
in Dwight Atkinson’s book on Alternative Approaches to Second Language
Acquisition (Larsen-Freeman, 2011) . I have to admit I
had to read it three times to really grasp the essence of the theory and how it
related to second language acquisition.
If you’re not familiar
with Complexity Theory and its relationship with Second Language Acquisition, I’d
like to share with you my short summary of Larsen-Freeman’s fantastic TESOL
Plenary, particularly regarding the topics of language acquisition and language
input. Then, if you’re interested in
more in-depth reading on Complexity Theory, I recommend Larsen-Freeman’s
chapter in Atkinson’s book or this article
(Larsen-Freeman, 2007) .
Complexity theory seeks
to explain complex, dynamic, open, adaptive, self-organizing, nonlinear systems
(Larsen-Freeman, 2011, p. 52). Fractals are the signature of complex systems;
as we go deeper and deeper into the structure, the same pattern occurs.
Larsen-Freeman’s main
thesis in her plenary is that, within the Complexity Theory framework, we can’t
really say that language is acquired, but rather, it is developed. Acquisition
implies language as a commodity that you ingest somehow. Language development
is the emergence of language abilities in real time. A pattern arises from the
interaction of the parts; emergence is the spontaneous occurrence of something
new. The edges of language are blurry; there is no end and there is no state. Acquisition
suggests completion and a one-way process, while development is bidirectional.
Larsen-Freeman also finds
the term input problematic because it dehumanizes the learner. For her,
acceptability is interlocutor-dependent. Input is problematic
because it is inert knowledge. She asks us why it is that students can do
something in the classroom but then can't do it outside the classroom later on.
It's because we don't teach language as dynamic. Meaningless repetition
contributes to the inert knowledge problem. She points out that iteration is different
from repetition. As a learner's system develops, it functions as a resource for
further development.
Students need to adapt
their behavior to an increasingly complex environment. This can be done through
iterative activity under slightly different conditions. Input suggests a one-way
action between an individual and the environment. Affordance is a better term
to use in this case - providing a language-rich environment where students will
find their own affordances; language develops from experience, afforded by the
learner's perceptions of the environment.
This development is
individual; learners define their own learning path. For this reason, we can't
average out data. What should be taught is not only language but also learners.
We need to design spaces with learners specifically in mind.
Above all, we transform; we don't transfer!
References:
Image courtesy of freedigitalphotos.net
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). On the complementarity of
Chaos/Complexity Theory and Dynamic Systems Theory in understanding second
language acquisitin. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10 (1), pp.
35-37.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). A Complexity Theory
Approach to Second Language Acquisition/Development. In D. Atkinson, Alternative
Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (pp. 48-72). New York, NY:
Routledge.
Image courtesy of freedigitalphotos.net
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
IATEFL 2014 - ELT Conference Highlights
Harrogate is a beautiful former spa town in northern
England and it was in this cozy city where spring was blossoming and flowers
were everywhere that the 48th Annual IATEFL Conference was held. It
was my first attendance at an IATEFL Conference and I was quite impressed with
the extraordinary multiculturalism , the astonishing volume of choice , the
impressive array of speakers and the cheerful atmosphere among the
participants.
The coaching and mentoring delegates formed a team in
Harrogate! We attended each other’ s presentations and exchanged a lot of
information and experience. It was wonderful to see that people from the most
distant parts of the world have been working hard to implement collaborative
practices in order to enhance teachers capacity and at the same time promote
professional development. All the sessions were excellent.
One valuable presentation I was able to catch was
given by Dr. Svetlana Belic Malinic from
Belgrade, Serbia. Svetlana presented the
results of an action research conducted
in an international school in Serbia which aimed to bring about change in
teachers perceptions of their pedagogical practice. The teachers were introduced
into reciprocal coaching schemata and, by doing peer coaching, were able to
support one another in their professional growth, which positively affected
their self-assessment. This shows how valuable it is to work collaboratively
and how teachers gain by exchanging their experience and practice.
In addition to the thought-provoking presentations I
attended, there was one innovative session format I really appreciated called ELT Conversation , which involved discussion
between two leading ELT professionals, Jeremy Harmer and Scott Thornbury. In this session the speakers
interviewed each other about the Communicative Approach. After 20 years, is it
time to redefine its concept? Is there a contemporary view of CLT? For more
than one hour, in a full auditorium, Harmer and Thornbury discussed the gains
and losses of this so well-established approach for language teaching followed
by questions addressed from the audience. A wonderful moment to revisit this approach
and reflect upon what we have doing in our classrooms in the last decades.
In the opponent flow, Jim Srivener gave a lively
presentation reassuring the importance of teaching grammar and urged the
audience to ignore those voices that tell you that you have to communicate all
the time. The presenter stressed that, yes, students want, need and learn from
grammar. The question is how teachers can make grammar genuinely engaging,
valuable and challenging. In order to make grammar really meaningful, Jim Scrivener
stresses that we should use lots of examples. They are input. And we should play
with examples. This is practice. We should never forget to make examples sound
real. Personalization is fundamental. After personalizing , students then are
able to use the language.
As you can see through my highlights above, IATEFL was
filled with diversity and innovation which have made me an IATEFL convert.
Those were professionally inspiring and enjoyable days that will always remain
in my mind. My thanks for the support and encouragement the Casa has given me
to participate in such a fabulous event.
Margarete Nogueira |
Labels:
action research,
conference,
efl,
elt,
ELT conversation,
esl,
grammar,
iatefl,
iatefl2014,
jeremy harmer,
jim scrivener,
scott thornbury,
Svetlana Belic,
teachers,
teaching,
tefl
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
TESOL 2014 and Being a Leader
This was
the first time I attended a TESOL and I was amazed at how big and how
well-organized it is. It was great to see so many teachers from all over the
world learning, sharing, motivating and being motivated. There was a huge
variety of topics for the presentations, with options for everybody’s interests.
I chose to attend those related to Teacher Development and Leadership not only
because of my present position at Thomas, but also because I believe we
teachers are always searching for professional development opportunities and we
are all leaders.
There was
one particular presentation I enjoyed a lot and would like to share with you:
“Leadership Skills and Styles Affecting Leaders” by Dr. Sufian Abu-Rmaileh,
from the United Arab Emirates University.
He started
by defining Leadership:
“The act of identifying important goals and then motivating and enabling others to devote themselves and all necessary resources to its achievement. It includes summoning one’s self and others to learn and adapt to the new situation represented by the goal” (NYSBR 2003, p. 3)
“Much more an art, a belief, a condition of the heart, than a set of things to do” (De Pree 1989, p.148)
So, who is
a leader?
Astin and
Astin (2000) define a leader as anyone who has a formal position and who holds
the role of bringing about change in the society in which they live and work.
De Pree
(1990) says that one of the major tasks of a leader is to expand and unleash
the talents and skills of the different people in the organization.
These definitions
made me think of how much we teachers match them. Every semester we face
different challenges to which we have to adapt and learn how to deal with. We
are in charge of groups of students who need our constant guidance, model,
assistance and motivation. More than teaching English, we teach them how to
respect and help their peers, how to accept different opinions, how to overcome
their difficulties.
Good leaders help their team achieve their goal, which
should be in accordance with the institution’s/organization’s. I particularly
like De Pree’s saying about the role of
a leader. A good teacher/leader should be able to expand and unleash the
talents and skills of the different people s/he leads.
There are
different leadership styles and we can adopt different styles according to our
and others’ necessities and in different moments of our life. Dr. Abu-Rmaileh talked
about the six leadership styles listed below.
1. Directive Leader:
Allows little or no negotiations
Keeps tight control without delegating
Is not flexible or open to new ideas
2. Visionary Leader:
Has clear standards and feedback
Explains the logic behind procedures
Inspires people to a higher purpose for their work
3. Affliliative Leader:
Creates harmony and affective/emotional bonding
Avoids confrontation with others
Provides little explanation on direction or rationale behind tasks
4. Democratic/Participative Leader:
Collaboration and team concurrence
High on trust, respect and commitment
Motivates his/her team by empowering them to direct themselves
5. Pacesetting Leader:
Sets high standards for performance
Obsesses about doing things better, faster, quicker
The pursuit of excellence is overwhelming
6. Coaching Leader:
Helps team members to discover their own strengths and weaknesses
Guides people to find and create their own career development
Links goals, personal and career, with those of the organization
Leadership Matrix
|
How it Builds Resonance
|
Impact On Climate
|
When Appropriate
|
Competency requirements
|
Visionary
|
Moves people towards shared dreams
|
Most
strongly positive
|
When changes require a new vision, or, when clear direction is needed
|
Self-Awareness, Self-Confidence, Empathy, Transparency, Visionary
Leadership, Change Catalyst
|
Coaching
|
Connects what a person wants with organisational goals
|
Highly
positive
|
To help an employee improve performance by building long term
capabilities
|
Self-Awareness, Empathy, Developing Others
|
Affiliative
|
Creates harmony by connecting people to each other
|
Positive
|
To heal rifts in a team, motivate during stressful times, or
strengthen connections
|
Empathy, Teamwork & Collaboration, Conflict management, Building
Bonds
|
Democratic
|
Values peoples input and get commitment through participation
|
Positive
|
To build buy in or consensus, or to get valuable input from employees
|
Empathy,
Teamwork & Collaboration, Influence
|
Pacesetting
|
Meets challenging and exciting goals
|
Is often Highly Negative - because it is generally poorly
executed
|
To get high quality results from a motivated and competent team
|
Self-Awareness, Empathy, Self Control, Achievement Drive,
Transparency, Initiative, Adaptability, Teamwork & Collaboration
|
Commanding
|
Soothes fears by giving clear direction in an emergency
|
Can be Highly Negative – because so often misused
|
In a crisis, to kick start a turnaround, or with a problem employee
|
Self-Awareness, Self-Control, Empathy, Achievement drive, Initiative
|
http://www.
maetrix.com.au/leadership_styles.asp
I’m sure
you have recognized yourself at different moments of your professional life in
many of the characteristics listed above. These characteristics are just a few
among many others for each style. We can select some and put them together to
come up with our idea of an effective leader. Dr. Abu-Rmaileh presented
effective leaders as being:
-
Visionary
- - Trustworthy, fair and honest
- - Role Models and Mentors – “Effective leaders demonstrate courage in difficult situations, and provide a model of moral leadership for other to emulate” (NYSBR, 2003, p. 2)
- - Visible
- - Dedicated – Effective leaders are dedicated to the institution which they serve. They have commitment and loyalty to the constituents and to the institution.
- - Good Communicators
The
implications of good leadership are many. Good leadership in the classroom
leads to a calm end of semester, not necessarily an easy one, but surely one in
which we have a sense of accomplishment. Some of the implications Dr.
Abu-Rmaileh talked about and I believe are appropriate for a classroom
environment were:
- - Achievement drive: high level of effort, high levels of ambition, energy and initiative
- - Honesty and integrity: a trustworthy environment
- - Self-confidence: belief in one’s self, ideas and ability
- - Emotional maturity: well-adjusted groups
The
presentation made me reflect on the kind of leader I am and the kind of leader
I want to be, my personal characteristics that influence on my leadership
style, and the aspects I need to work on in order to be a better leader. I hope
it helps you see yourselves as leaders too and realize the importance of being
a good leader.
Labels:
efl,
elt,
esl,
leader,
leadership,
management,
tefl,
tesol,
TESOL2014,
vision
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)